I have the grading blues. Great papers and terrible papers are not my problem. It's those in the middle--that awkward sentence that I can't figure out how to fix, that slightly-off-the-mark summary that is sort of right, but not right, that structural issue that requires a lot of thinking to discern. It gives me a headache.
How many minutes per paper? How much commentary? Do you type your comments or write them at the end of the paper?
Help, help... I have the grading blues.
Medievalism, and migration
5 years ago
I go back and forth: typing allows me to keep a record of my comments, which I like (particularly for writing rec letters years later), but writing keeps me more concise, which I think is better for the students . . . I'm tempted someday to try it all virtually, using Word's track changes or something - I'd love to hear if anyone's tried that . . .
ReplyDeleteOoh. Word tracking changes. That's an idea. But will we fix everything that they should fix??
ReplyDeleteI write comments on the paper and attach a typed commentary. The comments are usually word changes, grammatical problems, and snarky rhetorical questions (e.g. "Agamemnon is part and parcel with..." elicits "So Agamemnon is a box, huh?"), while the commentary is bigger picture and more positive (e.g. "You've done an excellent job with identifying the context; now you just need to dig deeper!").
ReplyDeleteThe efficacy of this approach? I don't know. I want to believe that it allows me to strike a balance between being justifiably harsh and constructive, but it may just confuse the poor bastards.
Either way, it allows me to work through some deep-seeded parental issues.
I agree. Write only sarcastic comments, or at least "no", withholding "good" or "yes" unless they've really earned it. But type a summary of the written assignment that's constructive.
ReplyDelete